Aryania Disclaimer: The article is not meant to support any Abrahamic faith. The Aryan people should abandon all such superstition!

In this post I’ll examine whether it’s possible in the text of the Hebrew scriptures to confirm whether or not Jesus’ virgin birth is tenable.

First we have to understand that the disciples of Jesus were the first believers in him. They weren’t even called Christians until later. They were a Jewish sect until the Jewish synagogues banned them. The followed Jewish law, worshipped in the synagogues on Saturday, didn’t consume pork, etc.

Why do Christians believe Jesus was a deity? The son of the jewish god? Probably because of John 3:16:

For this is the way God loved the world: He gave his one and only Son, so that everyone who believes in him will not perish but have eternal life.

John 3:16 NET

Above is probably the most read and believed passage in the New Testament, but it lacks actual proof!

Well after the Hebrew scriptures were compiled, the Greek New Testament book of Matthew reads like this:

Now the birth of Jesus Christ happened this way. While his mother Mary was engaged to Joseph, but before they came together, she was found to be pregnant through the Holy Spirit.

Because Joseph, her husband to be, was a righteous man, and because he did not want to disgrace her, he intended to divorce her privately.

When he had contemplated this, an angel of the Lord appeared to him in a dream and said, “Joseph, son of David, do not be afraid to take Mary as your wife, because the child conceived in her is from the Holy Spirit.

She will give birth to a son and you will name him Jesus, because he will save his people from their sins.”

This all happened so that what was spoken by the Lord through the prophet would be fulfilled:

“Look! The virgin will conceive and bear a son, and they will call him Emmanuel,” which means “God with us.”

Matthew 1:18-23 NET

If you check for a cross reference for verse 23, you’ll generally find Isaiah 7:14 listed:

Therefore the Lord himself shall give you a sign; Behold, a virgin shall conceive, and bear a son, and shall call his name Immanuel.

Isaiah 7:14 KJV

Sounds like an accurate cross reference, right? Let’s look at the full context though, since the New Testament writers sometime employ poetic license.

The Lord again spoke to Ahaz:

“Ask for a confirming sign from the Lord your God. You can even ask for something miraculous.”

But Ahaz responded, “I don’t want to ask; I don’t want to put the Lord to a test.”

So Isaiah replied, “Pay attention, family of David. Do you consider it too insignificant to try the patience of men? Is that why you are also trying the patience of my God?

For this reason the sovereign master himself will give you a confirming sign. Look, this young woman is about to conceive and will give birth to a son. You, young woman, will name him Immanuel.

He will eat sour milk and honey, which will help him know how to reject evil and choose what is right.

Here is why this will be so: Before the child knows how to reject evil and choose what is right, the land whose two kings you fear will be desolate.

Isaiah 7:10-16 NET

Let’s break this down

This is the story of Isaiah delivering a sign to King Ahaz that he will not be defeated by the armies arrayed against him at the time, which was roughly 700 years before the birth of Jesus. Jerusalem is under siege, but Isaiah is delivering the jewish god's assurance to King Ahaz that he will not be defeated.

The Sign?

What is the actual sign given to Ahaz, that a virgin will conceive? No! The sign is that the siege will be over by the time the young child is old enough to know good from evil. The pregnancy is simply pointed out as a means to identify who that child will be. The pregnancy is not the sign.

The Virgin?

Is the pregnant woman a virgin? No! The Hebrew word “alma”, which means young woman/maiden, is used. Isaiah uses the proper term for virgin, “betulah”, in Isaiah 23:12, 37:22 and 47:1.

Had he intended to mean virgin in this passage, he would have used the same word “betulah”. For this reason, many modern English translations do not translate the word virgin in this passage, because it is inappropriate to do so.

The Septuagint?

Frequently it is argued that the rabbis who translated the Septuagint translated the word alma as virgin in Isaiah 7:14. However, that is incorrect. Tradition says Ptolemy II sponsored the translation of the Torah into Greek, which was performed by 70 rabbis. Tradition also says that all 70 rabbis translated the entire Torah while individually sequestered, and all 70 copies matched word for word. Whether either is true is difficult to ascertain.

We do know, however, that only the Torah was translated initially. The remainder of the Septuagint was translated and assembled 200-300 years later, and by whom we do not know. Further, we do not have the originals, so further redaction is possible in the manuscripts we do have. What scholars do generally agree on is that the Torah of the Septuagint was translated well, while the remainder was of a decidedly inferior quality, with Isaiah being among the worst.

(For details see Wikipedia’s article on the Septuagint.)

Final nail in the proverbial coffin?

Finally, let’s apply some simple logic to this situation. New Testament authorities have long claimed Isaiah 7:14 as a dual prophecy, i.e. a prophecy which was fulfilled in its time but also applies to a future event as well. Think about what that means if you are a New Testament believer who accepts this premise.

The clear implication missed by most is that this original young woman from Isaiah’s time, who predated Jesus by 7 centuries and which New Testament believers claim was a virgin just as Mary was means this: Jesus was at least the second such virgin birth!

This destroys the idea of Jesus being the jewish god's “only begotten son”, as his alleged virgin birth was not original! Why don’t New Testament adherents consider the first virgin-born child as “the messiah”? He isn’t even named!

Therefore it’s obvious that Jesus’ birth was not a supernatural virgin birth, which means Jesus was not a Deity and did not rise from the dead or save the world for all mankind’s sins!

Most Bible believers will simply believe the corrupt virgin birth narrative no matter what, in order to cling to their superior, elevated stations so others can be belittled and ridiculed. Christianity is a cult designed to distract mankind from the truth and a mechanism of population control.

If a few Aryan people can escape this myth, please consider joining the National Alliance.